| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Rape Trial of Lanah Sawyer ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Rape Trial of Lanah Sawyer
Rape Trial of Lanah Sawyer
Lanah Sawyer was a 17-year-old seamstress who, in 1793, claimed to have been raped by prominent New York socialite, Harry Bedlow. Sawyer took Bedlow to trial but he was acquitted by an all male jury after only fifteen minutes of deliberation. Protests following the trial incited debate about upper-class privilege and gender bias in the American court system. The trial is cited by many authors as evidence of the sexual double standard that existed in colonial America.
==Rape and Trial==
Lanah Sawyer claimed that while on a walk with Harry Bedlow, the wealthy New Yorker, who she had thought to be a gentleman, forced her into a brothel and made sexual advances despite her protests. Sawyer took Bedlow to trial, but after only fifteen minutes of deliberation, Bedlow was acquitted of the crime by an all male jury. Bedlow’s defense argued that Sawyer’s agreement to go for a walk with Bedlow was implied consent. 〔 Sanday, P. (1996). A woman scorned: Acquaintance rape on trial (1st ed.). New York, NY:Doubleday. 〕 This belief stemmed from a change in the perception of female sexuality, which had developed over the course of the 1700’s. Gone was the Puritan perception of women as reserved, non-sexual beings. In its place surfaced a stereotype of a female temptress, developed from the abundance of literature, both poems and novels, published during the 18th century, which featured female characters actively pursuing men with a permissive attitude towards sex. This new perception of women spawned a new attitude towards rape as well. In the 1600’s women who made claims of rape were more often than not automatically believed since it was thought that a woman would not be so bold as to falsely accuse a man or dare to actively pursue sexual activity on her own, therefore she must have been raped. 〔 Millender, Michael Jonathan. "The Transformation of the American Criminal Trial, 1790-1875." Order No. 9701246 Princeton University, 1996. Ann Arbor: ProQuest. Web. 21 Sep. 2015. 〕 By the late 1700’s however, this new perception of women as sexually uncontrollable made the claim of rape less believable, making trials like Lanah Sawyer’s, in which rapists got off uncharged, much more common. 〔 Freedman, Estelle B. "The Narrowing Meaning of Rape." Redefining Rape: Sexual Violence in the Era of Suffrage and Segregation. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2013. 17-19. Print.〕
This dismissal of female claims was made worse by the fact that women were also not considered full citizens at the time of Lanah Sawyer’s rape. In her trial, Sawyer’s female neighbor testified in defense of Lanah’s character, corroborating the opinion that Sawyer would not willingly go to bed with a man prior to marriage, however the neighbors testament was ignored due to the fact that she was a woman too, and could therefore not be trusted to have a sound legal opinion. It was argued that putting the life of a citizen in the hands of a woman was not proper, a statement that resonated with the male jury, allowing ultimately for Bedlow’s acquittal. 〔 Sommerville, Diane Miller. ""PMS MADE ME DO IT" AND OTHER GENDERED LEGAL DEFENSES." Reviews in American History 38.3 (2010): 499-505. ProQuest. Web. 21 Sep. 2015. 〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Rape Trial of Lanah Sawyer」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|